Skip to main content
11:00 pm
not risking what -- whatever recovery there has been to this point? i'm not following. >> it didn't help president hoover, and it sure didn't help fdr when he tried the same thing in '37, 1937. it's a loser. no, i'm hearing that some people are saying that, well, this spending freeze wouldn't just exempt national security spending but would also have exempt things like health care and stimulus. so we have, there are two real options i guess. one it's either just sort of empty rhetoric that's designed to appeal to i'm not sure who, maybe the teabaggers. i'm not sure. or it's just a really bad policy decision. neither of them, i think, acquit the administration very well and i wish this concept would never have come up because we're going to rise and fall as democrats in november by whether people have jobs or not. that should be the focus. and a spending freeze does nothing to create jobs. >> is scott brown being positioned the way the first president bush talked about the
11:01 pm
iraqi republican guards, that he's 80 foot tall and shoots bullets out his back side? >> you got to admit it was pretty impressive how scott brown in the special election in massachusetts became both senate majority leader and president of the united states. i've never seen something like that. but i like to say that only democrats would consider themselves in the minority with 59 seats in the senate and only republicans would consider themselves the majority with 41. it's a sad state of affairs. >> entitlement and the lack of experience respectively >> great thanks for coming in on the breaking news. >> any time. thanks so much. >> that's "countdown" for this the 2,461st day since the previous president declared mission accomplished in iraq. one other late bit of news. bill o'reilly's lead story tonight was again bill o'reilly. i'm keith olbermann. good night. and good luck. now to discuss more on the
11:02 pm
president's state of the union and that breaking possible blanch lincoln news out of arkansas, here is rachel maddow. >> thank you. we begin with breaking news out of the white house. we have learned just this evening that president obama plans to propose a spending freeze during his state of the union address on wednesday. obama administration officials who briefed reporters on the plan today say the freeze would last for three years. it would not affect defense, veterans affairs, homeland security, or state department spending, but it would affect everything else. the white house says it expects the three-year freeze to save $250 billion over the next decade. a senior administration official at one point confirming to reporters that once you factor in inflation what the president will be proposing is actually a reduction in government spending. you might recall that republican senator john mccain ran for and lost the presidency on the idea of answering economic calamity with a spending freeze.
11:03 pm
since that's the kind of strategy that herbert hoover used in the '30s to make the depression great. conservatives in the president's own party like evan bayh of indiana have recently alternated between calling for a spending freeze and publicly crossing their fingers that the president would announce a spending freeze in the state of the union. >> but we can do something right here right now starting next week. the president can say in his state of the union address, i'm going to include in my budget a freeze on discretionary spending. i'm drawing the line in the sand. i'm willing to use my veto pen to enforce that. not ten months from now. not two years from now. but right now. >> do you think he'll do it? >> i think there is a fighting chance that he will. that's what i'm looking for. >> that's what i'm looking for. you know, if you've ever taken economics, it's usually on day two of like a 101 level college econ class where they teach you a spending freeze is not the way to bring the economy out of a
11:04 pm
downturn, let alone a recession. one lesson from the japanese recession in the 1990s was that the government was not aggressive in spending enough for long enough and that's why it became japan's lost decade. instead of japan's lost couple of years. then of course there was the great american mistake of 1937 when as the u.s. was finally coming out of the depression, in a burst of stupid hooverism the government stopped spending for recovery too soon and it put the economy right back in the drink. deficit spending is what governments do to get economies moving again. a spending freeze is like trying to put out a fire by pouring gasoline on it. and yet that is exactly what the president is apparently going to propose doing this wednesday. joining us is jared bernstein, vice president biden's chief economist and economic policy adviser who was not booked on this show to talk about this this evening but then this late breaking news happened and i ruined your night. >> i'm happy to talk about whatever you like.
11:05 pm
>> all right. i appreciate it. i know this was a sort of a bait and switch on you. we didn't mean it. >> it is and it isn't. but go ahead. i'm going to point out how some of our announcements today contradict some of your concerns about the spending freeze. go ahead. >> let's go right at it. why call for a spending freeze in the middle of an economic downturn? that seems counterintuitive to say the least. >> first of all, not in the middle because we're talking about a freeze that would take effect in 2011. the important thing, rachel, that your comments didn't get to is that we're not talking about an across-the-board freeze. that entitles this president to comb through the budget and find policies that help to create jobs and boost the middle class, like the policies we announced today, which is what i was going to talk about anyway here, and to cut back on spending on the wasteful stuff, stuff that accumulates over the years, that congress has a very hard time pulling back on, the lobbyists love, so we're talking about
11:06 pm
boosting the spending that helps the middle class pushing back on the special interests. so for example today we talked about a set of programs that will be in the state of the union that will be in this budget, the very budget we're talking about, programs that nearly double the child care tax credit for middle class families, cutting much higher into the middle class than the current policy, retirement security policies, policies that help students facing burdensome debt from college loans. policies that help with elder care. all of those are policies that can be boosted while this freeze is pulling back on some of the wasteful stuff that is nothing to do with jobs in the middle class. >> to be clear, what we're hearing tonight from washington is that this proposed spending freeze would be everything other than defense, veterans affairs, homeland security, or state department spending and also entitlements. you're saying that's not
11:07 pm
racket. you're saying there are whole other swathes of the budget that the president is not dedicated to freezing. >> what i'm saying is that is an aggregate freeze but not an across the board freeze. let me explain. if you have an across-the-board freeze you say okay, folks. every agency, everything goes down by 3%. end of story. real simple. that's not what this is. some things will go down. some things will go up. more things will go down than will go up. that's how you achieve some of the deficit savings. but the fact is that we can get in there and target those parts of the budget for expansion just like the ones i mentioned. now, on the other -- there's also a bunch of emergency spending that's outside of this freeze. the recovery act will continue to create employment. by the way, that's one of the other things i wanted to talk to you about. because i know you get this. the recovery act saved or created 2 million jobs so far,
11:08 pm
on track to create or save another 1.5 million before it's done. that's going to be in effect of course the rest of this year and in 2011 as well. this freeze won't affect that at all. new jobs initiatives that the president will be outlining in the state of the union. those will also be accommodated under this program. so we're going to really shift our focus here to stuff that works and to help stabilize what is truly a long-term, unsustainable budget picture, by squeezing stuff that doesn't help. >> so cutting $250 billion out of the budget -- and at this point you're saying don't worry, it'll be all good cuts and the only stuff that will be left and increased is the stuff that creates jobs, it's hard to imagine that there is going to be a big enough impact on the deficit here to outweigh the overall effect of cutting government spending at a time when government spending is one of the true successes in why we're turning around out of this recession. i mean you can brag on the stimulus and talk about how more of it is still due to go into effect. >> right.
11:09 pm
>> it seems like responsible economists right now and many of those polled by "usa today" are saying we need a second stimulus. >> right. >> you guys are not only not talking about a second stimulus, you're talking about trying to cut $250 billion out of the budget. >> well, first of all -- >> i have to tell you it sounds completely insane. >> $250 billion over ten years but by the way, i think it's wrong that we're not talking about additional programs to foster job growth. the president last month talked about new jobs initiatives in areas of clean energy investment, building on some of the successes of the recovery act that you mentioned, but also considerable deep investments in clean energy, manufacturing for example, here in the united states, building the components of the new clean energy economy, education spending. the president talked about some favorable tax policies for small businesses. that's very much part of this
11:10 pm
targeted jobs agenda that you'll hear more about on wednesday night, and infrastructure spending. and by the way to that the president attached a number, $50 billion. so we're talking about some serious investments in job growth to boost the middle class. and i would again remind you about a set of announcements the president and vice president made today in the area of child care, elder care, student lending, retirement security, all part of new initiatives or expanded initiatives that you'll hear going forward, totally consistent with the freeze we're talking about. >> all of which are very on message and will make a big difference to the working families that will benefit from those directly. they are relatively small, relatively targeted programs. by saying there is going to be a discretionary freeze in discretionary spending going into effect in three years and we have to find all the spending we need as a government within these parameters, where, you know, in real terms with inflation, overall spending is going to shrink. if responsible economists say you know what we need is a
11:11 pm
second stimulus, this pronouncement tonight has made that impossible. if there needs to be some other major job creation effort, not the minor targeted problems that you're talking about, there is no room for that. >> no, i disagree in the following sense. let me tell you -- and i work with christine romer, and the president and vice president get this. there is going to be no stupid hooverism around here to use your, i think, very apt term. spending programs in order to generate the kind of job growth we need to offset this impact of what was the deepest recession since the great depression generally will fall outside of this freeze. all of the programs i mentioned. these are -- yes, you can say that some of the programs i mentioned regarding the middle class are relatively smaller than, say, a $787 billion stimulus package, but when you start talking about $50 billion for infrastructure, when you start talking about resources for small business lending, when
11:12 pm
you start talking about significant investments in clean energy, you're talking about real money and real jobs. and this president is just not going to give up on the urgency of delivering that for the american people while at the same time squeezing down on spending that does nothing to boost the middle class or create jobs that nobody has been able to do anything about and that's making this budget unsustainable. so i say stay tuned, rachel. >> i hear you and i hear your optimism here, but you're trying to sell the virtues of government spending to rebuild the economy on a day that the white house has just announced a spending freeze. while there may be spending out there that is not good for the country that isn't creating jobs or doing what we need for the economy, there is no reason why those things couldn't just be cut without an overall pledge to reduce the total amount of government spending, which i maintain still sounds like stupid hooverism. >> if everybody that we negotiated on these kinds of issues with gets this the way you did, you probably would be right. but in fact when you get into
11:13 pm
the budget -- and i thought it would be easier than it was. maybe i was a little naive. there is a lobby behind every single dollar in the federal budget. if you don't believe that, come sit in on a budget meeting. it is so difficult to surgically get rid of the wasteful stuff. you need a program just like this where the president is going to have to get the buy-in from the congress on this to comb through the budget and to finally do something about those programs that aren't addressing our key priorities. middle class families, job growth, wages and incomes for the broad, working middle class. that's what we've got to be about. rachel, if you find us cutting programs that boost those kinds of opportunities, bring me in here and we'll talk about. >> well, the pledge to defend defense, veterans, homeland security, and state and entitlements, target everything else for a freeze is going to make those fights a lot harder, not easier in terms of making them on their substance because you've just made the competition that much tougher.
11:14 pm
i would say, mr. bernstein -- i mean, you are thought of as one of the progressives, one of the people progressives take heart is in the administration. a lot of people are very happy on the left when vice president biden asked you to be his chief economist and economic policy adviser. the white house was on the verge of really winning a lot of liberals over with taking on this fight with the banks and taking on wall street reform and taking on some of these other economic issues. really picking a fight with republicans on this. and then to have followed that up the next day, the next business day, by following evan bayh's idea to adopt john mccain's economic, main economic campaign promise for 2008 which he lost seems to me -- politically doesn't make any sense. >> well, folks will correct me if i'm wrong but my recollection is mccain's was an across-the-board freeze. remember ours is not an across-the-board freeze.
11:15 pm
ours is a freeze that enables us with the congress to go through this president to go through the budget -- and believe me his economic team will be sitting right there with him and try to accomplish the goals that i mentioned. by the way, you talked about progressives and our role within the administration. i just want to bring you back to this event today with the vice president, the president, the middle class task force. for the last year our task force has had 11 meetings across this country where the vice president has heard from families about the budget difficulties that they face, paying for college, paying for child care, paying for elder care, saving for retirement. and today let's not let or forget this, rachel because i would especially like someone like you to help appreciate and amplify this point. let's not forget that today this president stepped in and did something that presidents haven't done for decades that this middle class squeeze has been forming and he did something about it. he helped to ease that squeeze with an extension of that child care tax credit that went from capping out at $40,000 to up to $80,000 so that the max credit would now go to families much
11:16 pm
higher up in the income scale. for elder care, help to offset some of those costs. for kids paying burdensome debts on their student loans. that's the kind of targeted antisqueeze programs that we will -- you'll hear about in this budget and are completely consistent with the message of jobs and middle class families. >> do you know that -- does the administration know, i guess, is there an awareness that no matter how conservative you tack on some of the larger economic issues, trying to squeeze proof the middle class a little bit with those targeted things, but meanwhile taking what i hope you will concede is a big right turn with this pledge for an across-the-board or almost across-the-board spending freeze. you guys know you're not going to get any republican support, right? i mean this is this an effort to try to win republican votes for the president's economic agenda? because they're not coming. >> look, cutting wasteful
11:17 pm
spending is not a big right turn. it's neither right nor left. it's good budgeting. >> but cutting is something the president pledged to do before this today. this is new. this is a spending freeze in the midst of an economic downturn. and maybe we'll be out of the economic downturn by then, but pledging it now either sets you up to break that if we're still in the economic downturn or sets you up to put the country further into the drink than it already is in order to look conservative. >> it is important to remember that the freeze doesn't take hold until 2011 but that said, the fact that this is not an across-the-board freeze means that forget left and right. there are lobbyists supporting special interests throughout this budget that we can finally get in there and do something about. i just don't see why that's serving the american people poorly if and only if at the same time we're doing everything we can to deliver on jobs for the middle class. if we can do both of those, i would think that that would be exactly where we want to be. >> jared bernstein is the chief economist and economic policy adviser for vice president joe biden.
11:18 pm
you are a good sport to go toe to toe with me on this. you haven't vince convinced me at all and i think you have a huge policy and political problem on your hands because of this. but if all goes well, i think you'll be here more trying to defend it. i appreciate your time. thank you. >> you're welcome. >> the democrats need pass health care reform now. it's not me talking but the guy who got barack obama elected. pass it now literally means now like tomorrow, like tomorrow morning maybe. see how that goes. stick around.. host: does charlie daniels play a mean fiddle? ♪ fiddle music charlie:hat's how you do it son. vo: geico. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on car insurance. that keep you cool and dry have now inspired stayfree®
11:19 pm
to create a whole new level of comfort when it comes to your period. only stayfree® ultra thins have thermocontrol™. designed with the comfort of athletic fabrics in mind, stayfree® with thermocontrol™ quickly wicks moisture away for exceptional dryness. so you stay incredibly comfortable no matter where your day takes you. stay dry. stay cool. with thermocontrol™ only from stayfree®. stay dry. stay cool. if you choose a sauce based only on the label,
11:20 pm
you might be missing something. with prego, it's all about the sauce. in a blind taste test, more people preferred prego over bertolli. the sweet and savory taste of prego. it's in there.
11:21 pm
11:22 pm
you never know it by the headlines but democrats have giant majorities in both houses of congress. seeking to remind democrats and recapture political mojo that made that happen, president obama has brought back on board david plouffe, the campaign manager that organized his victory 14 months ago. on the same day "the washington post" published an op-ed for democrats. item number one pass health reform. now. quote, it's a good plan that's become a demonized caricature, politically speaking. if we do not pass it, the gop will continue attacking the plan as if we did anyway and voters will have no ability to measure the upside. if we do pass it, dozens of protections and benefits will
11:23 pm
take effect this year. only if the plan becomes law will the american people see all the scary things sarah palin and others have predicted such as the so-called death panels were baseless. we own the bill and the health care votes. we need to get some of the upside. so in short, pass health care, democrats. duh. what's the alternative? work all year for it, promise it, campaign for it. get both houses of congress to vote for it. then don't do it? some democrats apparently think so. you can recognize them because they're the ones who have spent the last week in the fetal position because their super majority in the senate was reduced to merely an awesomely large majority. thanks to the massachusetts special election. if democrats do in fact decide they have the will to live, they will take david plouffe's advice and pass health reform now. they've got two options to do so. they can either pass the senate bill through the house with fixes to the bill passed afterwards by reconciliation -- reconciliation meaning it will take 50 votes not 60. or they can pass the fixes first with those 50 senate votes and
11:24 pm
then pass the senate bill through the house afterwards. that's the choice. either way they can either have chocolate with peanut butter or peanut butter with their chocolate, but either way that's what they've got to do. they can either do that or quit. those are the choices at this point. joining us now is republican strategist mark mckinnon, who has advised the campaigns of john mccain and george w. bush. he is vice chairman of the public relations group public strategies and is also a contributor of course to the daily beast. mark, thanks very much for being here. really appreciate it. >> you bet, rachel. thanks for having me on. >> i don't know how much of our previous segment you heard, but if did you hear me fighting with jared bernstein, i wondered if it was music to your republican ears to hear liberals fighting with the white house over a spending freeze. >> i loved it. yeah, jared. keep at it. you're going the right direction. >> what do you think about my claim to him at the end of the rather chaotic interview in which i said, listen, no matter what you guys do, republicans aren't going to support you even on a spending freeze. do you think that's fair? >> well, i think they will get support for a spending freeze. that's a very conservative
11:25 pm
approach. it's something i like to see and obviously a lot of my colleagues do, too. and i think a lot of middle america does as well. the whole issue of david plouffe coming aboard, washington and the media are fascinated by the cultive personality. and if president obama had already passed the health care reform and had an approval rating of 90% plouffe would still be brought in to help with the mid-term elections. axelrod is saying okay fly boy. time to come off the book tour and roll up your sleeves and get back into the trenches. he is a good hand but he isn't going to fundamentally change what is going on. he isn't giving different advice than david axelrod or robert gibbs. those guys come from the same place. it's interesting that this washington game, while it doesn't do anything different practically speaking inside the white house for the press and ultimately the public it resets the frame. in other words the press will writ something large into this motion that david plouffe has
11:26 pm
come into the mix and things are going to change because he is there. but that will actually help the obama administration and team obama because it resets the frame and the press sort of says okay. we'll allow you now sort of to wipe the slate clean and allow you a fresh start and everything that happens now will be ascribed, i assure you, in some way to david plouffe and it will be the plouffe effect of what's going on. >> we got the news from the white house or the strategic leaks from the white house about plouffe coming back this weekend, and the two things that have happened thus far -- well, i guess three things have happened thus far. we got plouffe's op-ed in "the washington post" where he said, you better pass health care, you dummies, and do it right away. we got the president's speech today with vice president biden on relatively small, middle class targeted economic initiatives that are going to be announced in the state of the union. then we got this bombshell spending freeze announcement tonight, which is pretty much a scatter shot in terms of left/right. left/right political initiatives. if you want to put policies on a left/right number line. do you think those are
11:27 pm
reflective of plouffe's influence already or is this another thing where we'll just tag everything with his name that happens from here on out? >> i think that's the case. i think a lot of this was prebaked and i'm sure plouffe was talking to everybody months ago anyway. i think he's always been part of the mix and the dialogue and the conference calls and phone calls late at night. but, you know, this is a classic time in most presidencies, and it often happens after about a year when a lot of your capital is spent and the tough slogging of government begins. i feel badly for all of those people working hard in the white house because this is that time when they sort of are thinking oh, geez. thinking about the great job i left behind and that wonderful sunny place that i used to live in and where all my family and friends were and now the hard grind begins and it's not much fun. i mean, just government work is tough slogging. you got half the people telling you you should move left and the other half telling you to move to the center. i think it's going to be a very telling sign for the obama presidency, though, because this
11:28 pm
is a time when he really does have to step forward and make it clear just what he does stand for and i think the options are pretty clear. you go to the left. you try and pass health care. you do some of those ideological things that you talked to your base about doing. and perhaps establish a legacy but maybe also a one-term presidency. or you maybe take -- you do some more practical things that are nonideological, move more to the center and perhaps enhance your chances for a second term in my opinion. >> that makes sense totally in the abstract. but if you think about president obama not passing health care reform in order to be politically practical? you got to admit that's sort of a joke. president obama not walking away from health care at this point is him saying, you know what? this whole first year, the whole, we've made it further than we have in 60 years and passed a bill through both the house and the senate. i don't feel like finishing? that can't possibly be a political asset no matter how conservative the decision gets labeled. >> no, i don't think that's an option and i don't think under
11:29 pm
any scenario anybody would advise him to do that. you have to qualify and define what that means. there are the options you outlined or other options which is to say let's start and do this differently. let's pass portability, let's pass preexisting conditions. let's not do it as an omnibus, which seems to be what the american people are saying. i think there are different ways to skin that cat other than the ways you described. the problem with the way you described and the deals that were cut in nebraska and louisiana and with the labor unions is that the american public thinks whatever gets passed that way has been done with some special political deals which is not what they expected from the obama administration. >> trying to take it apart and doing it piece by piece at this point is a recipe for never doing it ever. the longer it takes the more likely it is never going to happen. the nebraska thing is out of the deal and the only thing which pulled positively is having a public option which keeps getting derided by everybody in the political world as being the
11:30 pm
crazy lefty idea though most americans like it. they got to pass something. >> well, listen. i tell you the bottom line. the thing that measures great presidents i think is the willingness to stand up and make very unpopular decisions. however that can be defined it means making a lot of people mad so whatever he does, if he does something great, it will probably make a lot of people mad. >> we can agree on that. somebody will be mad. i agree with you, mark. mark mckinnon a former adviser to president george w. bush and senator john mccain. really great to have you back on the show, mark. always a pleasure. thanks for joining us. >> carry on regardless, rachel. >> okay. so tracey ullman is a very funny person. so it is with a mixture of fleshed embarrassment and touch of nausea we will tonight show you her new televised impersonation of me. but first, one more thing. on passing legislation like health reform against republican
11:31 pm
opposition. we thought we were maybe crazy or naive to ask publicly if something could be done to kill the filibuster now. it's being used in ways it was never used before and nothing is getting done by the party that has all the majorities in washington. turns out there is a growing crowd on the kill the filibuster band wagon. senator tom harkin of course has said he will introduce legislation to lower the number of senators needed to overcome a filibuster. after days of debate until it takes just 51 votes to break the minority stranglehold. his cosponsor in the legislation? senator joe lieberman. his remaining power is threat of joining the filibuster. senator debbie stabenow told us on this show that she would like to see the filibuster rules changed though she thinks it is hard to do so. senator menendez and senator casey have also said they don't like the current status of the filibuster, and the president of the senate himself vice president joe biden has now voiced his frustration with the way the filibuster is being used as well. all of these folks expressing dismay with the current minority
11:32 pm
rules rules. starting to seem like a ground swell isn't it? tdd# 1-800-345-2550
11:33 pm
tdd# 1-800-345-2550 to help with my investments. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 so where's that help when i need it? tdd# 1-800-345-2550 if i could change one thing... tdd# 1-800-345-2550 we'd all get a ton of great advice tdd# 1-800-345-2550 just for being a client. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 i mean, shouldn't i be able to talk about my money tdd# 1-800-345-2550 without it costing me a fortune? tdd# 1-800-345-2550 if i had my way, investment firms would be tdd# 1-800-345-2550 falling all over themselves to help me with my investments. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 (announcer) at schwab investors rule. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 are you ready to rule?
11:34 pm
11:35 pm
somewhere between creepy, unethical, and simply against the rules lies the latest gem from the republican national committee. in envelopes that say do not destroy, official document and 2010 congressional district
11:36 pm
census, the republican national committee has mailed out fund raising surveys meant to look like the real u.s. census. you might recall that filling out your u.s. census form is actually required by law. this is a great trick, right? make people think they're required by law to read and respond to questions like do you think the record trillion dollar federal deficit the democrats are creating with their out of control spending is going to have disastrous consequences for our nation? make people think they are required by law to read and respond to that. the fake census also includes a letter from rnc chair michael steele that says, quote, strengthening our party for the 2010 elections is going to take a massive grassroots effort all across america. that is why i have authorized a census, capital c, to be conducted of every congressional district in the country. nothing on this authorized capital c census that is being conducted says this is voluntary because it's not the real census. and the real census bureau spokesperson today said that he had received complaints from people who have received this mailing from the republican party and felt that it was deceptive.
11:37 pm
the question now of course is whether democrats will fight this with fire by responding in kind with kerosene by whining about it, or with water by calling it out for what it is. ro for just $29.99 at red lobster. with fresh salads and biscuits, your choice of entrees, and an appetizer or a dessert to share. for a limited time at red lobster. breaking up is hard to do. so allstate will do it for you. switch to allstate, and your new agent will... help tell your old insurance company goodbye. saving you that uncomfortable breakup moment. and serious cash. drivers who switched saved an average of $396 a year. $473 if they dumped geico. breaking up is easy to do. ♪ remember when that's allstate's stand. are you in good hands? ♪ [ male announcer ] it is, the most advanced automobile we have ever created. a car that can help awaken its driver if he begins to doze.
11:38 pm
keep him in his lane if he starts to wander. even stop itself... if he becomes distracted. if you want to see the future of the automobile, look at where the e-class is...today. this is the 9th generation e-class. this...is mercedes-benz. see your authorized mercedes-benz dealer for exceptional offers through mercedes-benz financial.
11:39 pm
wow, that's a low price! wow, that's a low price! how many products do we carry? 7,000. [ man ] wow, that's a low price! i'll get him a cart. [ man ] hot diggity dog! yeah. that's a low price! [ male announcer ] staples has low prices on everything you need for your office. and we mean everything. staples. that was easy.
11:40 pm
in 2005 when they were still in the minority, democrats in the house pledged themselves to a new veterans bill of rights. in 2006, they won control of the house. and before the next election in 2008, they in fact passed the new g.i. bill. the biggest investment in veterans education since world war ii. the new gi bill passed both the house and the senate with big majorities and even though president george w. bush initially promised to veto it he did ultimately sign the new gi bill into law and it went into effect this summer. >> now with this policy we are making it clear that the united states of america must reward responsibility and not irresponsibility. with this policy we are letting those who have borne the heaviest burden lead us into the 21st century. >> something like the gi bill
11:41 pm
has a way of inspiring that kind of language and big picture thinking. but you know it also is a really specific nuts and bolts policy that offers cash money benefits to real iraq and afghanistan veterans going to college. and the va for all of the high minded language about this appears to be blowing its implementation. the va admitting to the military times this weekend that in the last three months of last year almost 90% of the calls made by veterans to the va's gi bill call center never connected. almost 90% of the time callers either got a busy signal or a message that their call could not be completed. remember, these callers are veterans trying to get information about benefits that they are due, that they have earned, that we have promised them. paul reickoff, executive director of the nonpartisan iraq and afghanistan veterans of america told us today, quote, how can the va expect veterans to properly apply for the gi bill when nearly 90% of the calls to the
11:42 pm
gi bill hotline don't connect? iava is obviously very concerned about this figure and number of people who have been left scrambling for answers. the va has so short staffed its gi bill call center that it's only open now monday through wednesday from 7:00 a.m. central time to 5:00 p.m. central time. and even then it's not getting 90% of the calls that are trying to connect. in fact, the va didn't even respond to our calls today for a comment from them on what the h-e-double hockey sticks is going on with them screwing up the gi bill and thereby screwing with our veterans. we'll keep calling i guess just like everybody else. next up people outside of south carolina now know two things about that state's lieutenant governor andre bauer who is running to nonhiker mark sanford. before friday if people knew anything about him it was even though he was mark sanford's lieutenant governor he didn't seem to like mark sanford all that much.
11:43 pm
you might remember him on this show talking all sorts of smack about mr. sanford in the middle of the hiking the appalachian trail scandal. since friday there is now a second thing people outside of south carolina know about lieutenant governor bauer. no matter what else he does in his life and career, he will always and forever more be the guy who when talking about government assistance said this. >> my grandmother was not a highly educated woman but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals. you know why? because they breed. you're facilitating the problem. if you give an animal or a person ample food supply they will reproduce. especially ones that don't think too much further than that. and so what you've got to do is curtail that type of behavior. they don't know any better. i can show you a bar graph where free or reduced lunch has the worst test scores in the state of south carolina. you show me the school that has the highest free lunch and i'll show you the worst test scores, folks. it's there, period. >> republican lieutenant
11:44 pm
governor bauer asking the people of south carolina to elect him governor and also saying that some of his constituents in south carolina are stray animals who need to be stopped from breeding by cutting off their food. today he said he is sorry but that is the kind of thing that is sort of hard to forget, isn't it? finally, there is important culinary and frankly foreign relations news tonight. for that we turn to the rachel maddow show's angus mcfarcer. >> hello, rachel. as your viewers surely know today is robert barnes day when we celebrate scotland's most illustrious poet. famous for such timeless classics as "a red red rose." i have to stop myself from breaking into tears
11:45 pm
from talking about it. in scotland we celebrate this day with whiskey and poetry and a national dish. the haggis. now, that's onion, oatmeal, salt mixed with stocks and simmered in a sheep's wee stomach for three delicious hours. americans haven't been able to make it because of the ridiculous ban on importing sheep's lung. but, wait, "the daily telegraph" reports that the united states department of agriculture is considering lifting a ban put on haggis in 1989 to prevent mad cow disease. so next barnes day, rachel, you come around and we'll have a wee dram and a big, slippery steamy pile of the haggis. oh, the mouth waters doesn't it? and for dessert, we'll have a deep fried snickers bar. come over. ambrosia. i am inviting you now. >> thank you very much, angus. i will consult my physician and think about it. appreciate it. >> it's a date.
11:46 pm
>> happy robert burns day, everybody. he means it about the legalization of haggis you know. we'll be right back. winner of the blind taste test. the sweet and savory taste of prego. it's in there. because with national, i roll past the counter... and choose any car in the aisle.
11:47 pm
choosing your own car? now that's a good call. go national. go like a pro. [ female announcer ] our bodies need water... and women who drink crystal light drink 20% more of it. ♪ crystal light.... water your body. and you have a heart attack. that's what happened to me. i'm on an aspirin regimen now. my doctor told me it's the easiest preventative thing you can do.
11:48 pm
[ male announcer ] be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. see your doctor. simple. still ahead comedienne tracy ullman's impression of -- me. some days are weirder than others at this job. owwww.... (announcer) not just sinus headache... but pressure... and congestion. (announcer) you need a sinus medicine ooohhh... that rescues you from all three symptoms introducing new sudafed pe® triple action™. for more complete relief from the sinus triple threat. get more complete relief. with new sudafed pe® triple action™. also find sudafed® behind the counter.
11:49 pm
on the night that the taliban government in kabul fell in 2001, an 11-man unit of green berets boarded blackhawk
11:50 pm
helicopters and flew into the south of afghanistan into the taliban heartland of kandahar. they had two missions. one, partner with the then unknown english-speaking pashtun who had been living in exile, a man named hamid karzai, to turn the pashtuns against the taliban. and, two, beat the taliban in kandahar in their home base. did i mention we're only talking about 11 guys here? they are operational detachment alpha 574. these 11 green berets, 11 men did something in 2001 that tens of thousands of americans are trying to redo nine years later in 2010. their story and their success is told through first-hand accounts by these green berets and with the assent of the families of those who did not survive in a remarkable new book called "the only thing worth dying for, how 11 green berets forged a new afghanistan." earlier i sat down with the author eric blehm, and army
11:51 pm
major jason amerine who led this team of 11 green berets on this incredible mission. thank you for being here. major, let me start with you. the taliban stronghold of kandahar, the only thing that most americans knew about afghanistan at the time that you were there. was that kandahar was their heartland. what was the plan to beat them there and what eventually worked? >> we worked with karzai to develop a plan to rally the pashtun tribal belt against the taliban. the taliban were a pashtun movement and the idea was to get the pashtun themselves to remove the taliban. karzai believed the taliban would be rejected by the pashtun, that they would fight with him against the taliban and that's what we were there to help him with to provide expertise, air support, and basically help him to carry out his vision. >> how do you cleave the pashtun from the taliban in that situation? weight the strategy? >> well, the taliban themselves did a good job themselves
11:52 pm
through their ruler. i mean, tie ran cal ruled, but the taliban were afraid to rise up. that's where karzai believed if he could get into the country, if he could work with us, show that there's u.s. support in his movement, as well as simply get awe the tribal leaders talking to one another, he would be able to build enough credibility to get them to rise up, overthrow the taliban. >> how long did it take in. >> it took us three weeks to do ale all together. >> how many of you were there? >> 11 of us. >> eric, how did you find out about this group of green berets? why did you decide to tell their story? and why did they decide to talk to you about it? >> i truly wanted to tell a story about the war. we've all watched the greatest generation and now veterans dying off from world war ii and their stories were disappearing and i wanted to do my part as a writer to tell something from
11:53 pm
our generation. by a strange, quirky set of events i found out that a sister of a friend of mine worked with the brother of somebody who was on that team. and i found out, looking back in my records, i had clipped articles at the time, that we didn't really know how hamid karzai came to power. i found out the major was working at west point. i offered to sit in on his class. i went in and talked to him. he said he'd be happy to talk with me, but first i should get the blessings of the family members of the men who didn't survive the mission. and that's what i did. that was really the starting point. >> of the 11, every single member of that group was either killed or wounded at this point? >> yes. >> major, i know you're active duty so we have to keep that in mind in asking you weigh in on political matters, but eight years later, the mission large in afghanistan is
11:54 pm
counterinsurgency, with a lot of conventional forces. of course, special operation forces as well. do you think there is an operational lesson for what you did? you and your 11 green berets did, in terms of the larger mission of what america's trying to do in country right now? >> well, our mission centered on two big points. one was offering the people of afghanistan an alternative to taliban rule, that was in the form of hamid karzai. to this day he actually has a strong approval rating. one of the polls i saw recently was around 70% of the population approve of his leadership. >> while also thinking the afghan government is broadly corrupt, those two numbers both very high. >> right. that's one of the big difficulties. on the one hand, they do support karzai but on the other hand they want to see change. but in 2001 and today, i mean, having a viable government that the people believe in is key. and the case of 2001 they didn't
11:55 pm
believe in the taliban. in the case of now, 2010, they actually still do believe in the government to a degree. they at least believe in karzai and he has high approval ratings, which isn't the same as popularity, but they want to see the corruption at least diminished. it's so imbedded that it's not realistic for the corruption to completely go away. it's going to take multiple generations. the other part that's critical over there is security. back in 2001 when we put the taliban on the run, there was a period there where the taliban were retreating and there was just a vacuum. karzai went into power and that was the time when we really needed to start establishing security. and i think we had sort of a false sense of security, pardon the pun, that came to haunt us, as afghanistan was forced to be a bit of a holding action as we moved on to iraq and had to put a lot of focus there on the security situation. so as we're looking at it now, we need to get the government
11:56 pm
running properly. we need to build on the positive support of the government that is still there. we need to get security established. >> eric, i know that in working on the book, you were able to meet with president karzai in 2008 -- 2008? >> 2008. >> to corroborate some of these green berets' accounts as to what it had been like on the ground in terms of this initial foray back into afghanistan with him. in meeting with him as recently as 2008 and thinking about the mission the major is describing, is is he the guy? does he have to be the guy? does it have to be a leader that america believes in in order for there to be a government there that works and the afghan people will support? >> well, karzai, i think the reason he rose in popularity, as a diplomat at the time, was he was a person that could bring different faxctions together. he's that same person as well. >> he wouldn't be there without the opportunities and liabilities without the sacrifices of you and your green
11:57 pm
berets. major jason and eric blehm, the author of "the only thing worth dying for," a fascinating read. thank you very much. appreciate it, both of you. relet release medicine fast to relieve painful coughs, congestion and sore throats. so you can feel better. somewhere in america... the slightest breeze harbors immense power. the tallest buildings leave the lightest footprints. a fifty-ton train makes barely a mark on the environment. and a country facing climate change finds climate solutions. somewhere in america, we've already answered some of the nation's toughest questions. and the over sixty thousand people of siemens are ready to do it again. siemens. answers.
11:58 pm
with cialis for daily use... a clinically proven, low-dose tablet for erectile dysfunction you take every day so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. don't drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long term injury seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away. (announcer) 36-hour cialis. or cialis for daily use. ask your doctor about cialis today, so when the moment is right, you can be ready.  ask your doctor about cialis today, and all of these. paid invoices go right here. bang!
11:59 pm
- that hasn't been paid yet. - what? - huh-uh. - all my business information is just a phone call away-- to my wife... who's not answering. announcer: there's a better way to run your business. intuit quickbooks online organizes your business in one place. it easily creates invoices and helps you stay on top of your business anytime, anywhere. this is way better. get a 30-day free trial at intuit.com. explorers, great thinkers. they're the future of america, so let's bring them up right and give them our cheese. ♪ kraft singles. the american cheese.

tv
The Rachel Maddow Show
MSNBC January 25, 2010 11:00pm-12:00am EST

News/Business. Politics, pop culture and today's top stories.

TOPIC FREQUENCY America 9, Rachel 7, Afghanistan 7, Us 7, Washington 6, Plouffe 5, David Plouffe 4, John Mccain 4, Kandahar 4, South Carolina 4, U.s. 4, George W. Bush 3, Hamid Karzai 3, Biden 3, United States 3, Jared Bernstein 3, Allstate 3, Joe Biden 2, Nebraska 2, Massachusetts 2
Network MSNBC
Duration 01:00:00
Video Codec mpeg2video
Audio Cocec ac3
Pixel width 704
Pixel height 480
Sponsor Internet Archive
Audio/Visual sound, color


disc Borrow a DVD of this show
info Stream Only
Uploaded by
TV Archive
on 5/21/2011
Views
82